Tax hike likely unavoidable, Liberal leader says
Here it comes! The bitter irony is that Ontarions will get a double whammy. For all this so called stimulus, Canadians need to understand that we will be paying much higher taxes for years to come to pay off all this government debt. Its would not be such a difficult pill to swallow if the actions (i.e. stimulus plans actually
benefited Canada)
Simple Question: Are you better off now?
January 28. 2009
As most of us know, a federal spend to stay in power budget was presented yesterday in Ottawa. I have created a chart that reflects some of the main differences between our new so called financial stimulus and the US one:
| US | Canada |
| $275 billion in tax cuts for individuals and businesses. | Increased access to credit |
| $500 tax break per individual | $76 tax break |
| Focus is on a green economy | ??? |
| $12 billion for mass transit | Incentives to buy cars |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Another interesting note, I contacted the so called Economic sustainability committee that is being managed by MPP Frank Valeriote and MPP Gerard Kennedy about why the focus for funding is on traditional manufacturing that is not only in trouble, but has been on the decline in Canada for at least 2 decades. Wanted to know why there isn't any focus on the SMB market (small to medium businesses) that has the following facts:
- Employs roughly 75% of the actual Canadian workforce
- Accounts for 40 - 50% of the Canadian GDP
- Contributes billions for infrastructure improvements (computers, phones etc.)
In my business, I here daily, that the govenment (at all levels)
is fixated on larhe manufacturing organizations
that simply put are become antiquated in Canada
and many may not survive transition from the industrialized
economy to post-industrialized one.
Many SMBs who are thriving would love to expand quicker
and hire more employees but try and get funding (fat chance!)
Why is this???????
Second Point:
Why isn't Canada heavily investing into R&D? It great to
fill potholes and build roads, but the future suggests we
invest into innovation and yet we have been decreasing
R&D funding support.
According to Canadian Business Mag., finding for Canadian
companies is almost non-existent, we focus on University
research but barely on the commercialization of products and ideas.
Again, I deal with start-ups who are highly innovative with great
ideas and so much intelligence and yet I always see the same thing.
There is little to no support from the government.
Its quite sad when you see our brightest people have to go
abroad to get funding or struggle indefinitely back home.
Bottom line is that there is a significant sector with such high growth
potential that should be getting massive support from the government and
yet it is the antiquated industries that are getting your full attention.
Whether we like it or not, the GMs, Linimar's and WC Woods of the world
will not be the future of economic prosperity. Its those little companies
that start with a great idea that really need our attention.
I have yet to get a response.

2 comments:
Whoopdedoo. We find out for the umpteenth time, that all four opposition leaders strongly dislike Harper, enjoy berating him, questioning his motives on everything, and nitpicking every policy he's done, or will do. But how much did we find out from ANY of them, the details of the best parts of their platforms ? Almost zip. I can see Dion wanting to avoid getting into Greenshift details. But Layton and especially May should have been stongly advocating their platforms. May works hard to get INTO the debate, then squanders the golden opportunity to explain many more elements of the Green agenda to an audience of millions ?! That doesn't make sense to me. May should have let the others beat the dead horse of "Harper is a scary, evil, Bush puppet with a hidden agenda who you can't trust with a majority, yadda, yadda"
Absolutely right! And many people that I spoke to afterwards as well had the same opinion. No substance during the debates at all. Did we learn anything?
Post a Comment